It can be hard to figure out exactly how
good you are.
You can play a whole game and make zero interesting
decisions.
Or you could spend eight turns finding out you have a long way to go.
Three friends went to GP Providence. We had
practiced a lot. We had a history of some success (2nd at the last
Team GP) etc. But this isn’t a feel good tournament report. And it isn’t an
appeal for pity.
I have finally found some time (and my notes) to do some honest reflection on facing two (maybe 3) future hall of famers; and then being weighed, being measured and being found wanting. Not a tournament report. Not a match report.
I have finally found some time (and my notes) to do some honest reflection on facing two (maybe 3) future hall of famers; and then being weighed, being measured and being found wanting. Not a tournament report. Not a match report.
So don't call this a report so much as a story about one game against the best
in the world.
Before the 2nd draft on Day 2,
we were 9-3. That’s not the end of the world, but it is not a great place to
face Cheon, Froelich and LSV.
I was summarily dispatched by LSV in the middle
seat. Jamie beat Paul. Which means it would be Maksym vs Efro for all the
marbles. In game 2, we played well and managed to find all the right attacks.
It was one of those games, where you didn’t necessarily outplay your opponent.
But rather we had managed not to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
I think most grinders would know the
feeling.
So its time for game 3. The good news is
that Maksym’s deck had Aetherling, Pack Rat and Soul Ransom. The bad news is
that last year their team had more pro points then our lifetime totals
combined. We were fighting the civil war of Ratinum. Efro’s deck was an
aggressive boros deck splashing blue for Ral Zarek and Beck//Call. We knew
about at least one Weapon Surge and were on the draw for game 3.
Jamie and I do a mental high five when they
take their mulligan and we see a rat. At least I think we do. Jamie’s probably
too a nice guy to revel in our opponent’s misfortune, but I hate imagining
myself on the solo end of a high five.
Grade = A++. Opponent on 6. We have turn 2
rat with 3 lands in hand. Played this part perfectly.
Grade = A. Nothing to screw up. Yet.
There are some small set of scenarios where
not playing pack rat is correct (and Maksym broached the topic). However,
against an aggressive deck I don’t think you can possibly afford to be that
cautious.
Grade: = A. Didn’t punt by not playing rat.
No victories are too small for this story.
TURN
3
At 14 life we face our first real decision.
3) Should
we spend a turn making rats or play a barrier?
3a) If
we make a rat can we afford not to block?
If we don’t block next turn we will be at
10 (if he plays another creature), or 6 if he just double pumps. After that we will have three 3/3s, but his
Truefire Paladin is an abyss and his other guys are trading for rats.
3b)
So we have to block if we make a rat. What are optimal blocks?
Presumably we would just block firstblade. A trick gets really costly here since we would be at ~10 with one rat facing 2 creatures. And again Truefire is close to abyss mode (assuming a 4th land).
Presumably we would just block firstblade. A trick gets really costly here since we would be at ~10 with one rat facing 2 creatures. And again Truefire is close to abyss mode (assuming a 4th land).
3c)
Whats the goal here?
We have soul ransom (he mulliganed) and
tons of gas. So we just want this game to go as long as possible. Which means
preserving life even if that means throwing away cards.
Hover Barrier makes the most sense in this
context. Its going to be especially good if his 4th land doesn’t
allow for double pumps (e.g. isn’t a mountain). A reasonable guess given his
mulligan and being on the play.
Grade: A. Found the important strategy for
the game.
TURN
4
Cluestone gives him double pump mana.
Truefire gives a way to grow an army that could potentially fight rats. The
whole game is going to shit. But he only has one card in hand and we have Soul Ransom.
We could also Fatal Fumes here. Millenial gargoyle, call of the Nightwing and
making PR#2 all don’t do enough defensively.
4)
Should we Fumes or Soul Ransom?
4a)
Assume Fumes whats the optimal target?
We can’t afford to let him have guildmage
in the long game and Soul Ransom isn’t a permanent answer. So we would have to
fumes guildmage. He then attacks with both.
4a –
II) If he attacks with both what do we block?
Chumping with rat seems unadvisable (but
maybe we should of considered it), so where to put the Barrier is question.
Paladin would kill it setting us up with a Pack Rat vs his board of two
creatures and being at 10. We would ransom paladin, he would discard two and we
would still be at 10 and have to chump with Pack Rat or go to 2. Not a winnable
board state.
If we block the Viashino, he pumps twice we
go to 6 and Soul Ransom his Truefire. He discards and we put Hover Barrier in
front. Leaving us with a rat at 4 life versus his two creatures. Not a winnable
board state.
4b)
What about Soul Ransom? Optimal Target?
I think its safe to assume he is going to
crack the Soul Ransom to get back whatever we take. If he gets it back
immediately, taking the Truefire is better since he can’t attack right away and
the paladin isn’t useful summoning sick. If he is holding a good card (or draws
one) he might wait a turn or two to crack it. In which case taking the
guildmage is better. I didn’t want to give him option value (e.g. the ability
to draw cards just make dudes), so I suggested we take the Sunhome Guildmage.
Grade: B. Not playing the fatal fumes is
good and not an obvious line. In retrospect taking the guildmage might have
been bad, since we can always fatal it the next turn if he decides to wait.
TURN
5
After Efro plays Goblin Rally, its obvious
hes setting up to get his guildmage next turn.
5)
Should we make a play, mainphase fatal fumes or hold up fatal fumes?
5a)
Can we afford for him to get guildmage back?
No.
No.
5b)
So mainphase or wait for him to discard?
The first question is the interaction
between Soul Ransom and Removal. Short answer is we get to draw 2. But, we had
to ask a judge to confirm. Luckily LSV seemed to get the wrong read here (based
on us asking the judge question). Maybe he assumed we knew basic rules
interactions. Joke’s on him.
5b2)
What happens if we wait, they figure it out and do nothing?
Well we have pack rat so our mana won’t
really be wasted. And they won’t be able to attack. Seems like waiting is fine.
Grade A-: I think we made the right play,
but it should have been obvious that we had removal because we had to talk to a
judge. A massive leak which better players would avoid.
TURN
6
On his turn 6, efro discards two cards and
we respond with fatal fumes. I have listed the 3 cards drawn on our turn 6 (two from Soul Ransom). He still gets to attack his board into our Rat +
Barrier. We could also chump with a rat.
6a) Who are we blocking with Hover Barrier?
If we don't block Truefire, we go to two life. We would also be facing 6 creatures, with 4 potential blockers. So we need to block Truefire Paladin.
6b)
Should we chump with rat?
We need to start making creatures at this point and Rat can make 2 a turn. Can’t afford to chump block (on Efro’s T6).
We need to start making creatures at this point and Rat can make 2 a turn. Can’t afford to chump block (on Efro’s T6).
For our turn 6 making two rats is the only
way to make two blockers and not die. He has 6 attackers and we have 3 blockers during his turn 7.
Grade: A. Made all the right plays, though
it is not like there were real decisions.
TURN
7
After he attacks with everything (4 tokens,
firstblade, truefire). We make 2 rats going up to 3 total and chump + kill 2
tokens. On our turn we face a bunch of possibilities given that we have 2 rats
in play.
7)
What are the options?
Plan to make two more rats on his turn (while holding up Cancel). Suppose we make the third rat and block everything but one token. He can either pump (+ first strike) his Paladin or not. If he does we make the 4th rat going to one but ending up with 3 rats. If he keeps his mana up we can trade boards and have cancel for his threat, followed by a threat. We can beat a burn spell (assuming it costs more than 2 mana) with this line.
Plan to make two more rats on his turn (while holding up Cancel). Suppose we make the third rat and block everything but one token. He can either pump (+ first strike) his Paladin or not. If he does we make the 4th rat going to one but ending up with 3 rats. If he keeps his mana up we can trade boards and have cancel for his threat, followed by a threat. We can beat a burn spell (assuming it costs more than 2 mana) with this line.
Alternatively
we can play a land and cast CotN.
7a)
Why cast Call of the Nightwing (CotN)? Why Not?
He can’t block the ciphered rat (because we
can make a third rat in combat). We end up with 2 bats, 2 rats (1 untapped) and
the ability to make 1 more rat, but no Cancel. Our ciphered rat is unlikely to
get in again. This is fine if he draws nothing.
However we lose to burn and maybe top
decked tricks. We are also lower on cards in hand (because we need to make
another land drop_ so in a stalemate we could conceivably lose given his abyss
Paladin.
Jamie and I thought we could afford to play
around top decks (and hold up cancel).
Maksym wanted to CotN and try and end the
game. Maksym was losing a game with turn 2 Pack Rat, so we overruled him. Just
kidding. Kind of. Fuck Karma.
Grade: B. Upon further reflection I think
it is definitely a close call. Also an important note was that his land didn’t
make red.
TURN
8
With zero cards in hand. Untap. Upkeep. Efro
draws his card.
Looks at LSV.
Cheon ~ “We have to attack or eventually his rat
will get us”.
Lucas - “100% they drew weapon surge”.
Obviously we go into the tank.
8a)
Could this be a bluff?
Very unlikely. If we didn’t have cancel we
are essentially forced to make two rats and quad block. This goes very poorly
for them if they don’t have anything (the board becomes our 3 rats versus their
paladin + one token). Its worse then just sending Paladin probably. And since
we are dead, we can’t really afford to play around anything.
This just reinforces the Weapon Surge read. I would like to think they give us enough credit to realize that bluff here doesn’t work. On the other hand the way they Hollywooded before attacking is a signal they aren’t giving us too much credit.
8b)
Then what Sherlock?
Well we have to make a dude because we are dead
without 3 blockers.
Lucas – “First things first, make a third
rat”.
Sometimes you need to be precise. To be
honest, I hadn’t even thought about what to discard. It was obvious to me that
we needed the first rat, and I wanted to take an action to buy more thinking
time.
Except we needed to think first, because what we discard is important.
Unfortunately we discarded Deathcult Rogue.
8c) Can we make 4 guys and block?
Not if we actually believe he has weapon surge since he can plague wind us.
8c) Can we make 4 guys and block?
Not if we actually believe he has weapon surge since he can plague wind us.
8d) What
happens if we block only 3 guys?
He can weapon surge or use 2 abilities from
Paladin, but not both.
If he decides to surge, then we cast
Cancel, he makes paladin a 4/2. That ends with us at 1 life facing a token. Him
with zero cards, but we would have CotN and Deathcult Rogue. Pretty good spot.
Except we discarded Deathcult Rogue. So we
would have Island and CotN When he attacks
with Token we have to chump with token. And it’s a topdeck war with us at 1
life. He has a cluestone he can crack to find an extra card as well. That isn’t
great for us.
If he doesn’t cast weapon surge and instead
makes a 4/2 first strike we can make another rat. He loses a goblin token and a
Viashino Firstblade. We are at 1 life, but have 3 rats. Even better then above.
8e)
Ok so, assuming he players correct (and weapon surges), what do we do now that
have discarded Deathcult Rogue?
Then
the doubt creeps in.
What made me so sure he had drawn weapon
surge? Obviously a snap read is based on intuition but if you put a gun to my
head how sure would I have been really? 70%? 90%? How likely are we to win the
games where he is actually bluffing, and we just call?
Some people would tell you the pressure was overwhelming or they felt the world on their shoulders. But it was nothing so dramatic. My lucky history in Magic has given me wealth of experience on being embarrassed during feature matches.
Some people would tell you the pressure was overwhelming or they felt the world on their shoulders. But it was nothing so dramatic. My lucky history in Magic has given me wealth of experience on being embarrassed during feature matches.
Instead I gave my team “the speech”.
Lucas: “We fucked up. We are probably
10-20% to win if play around my initial read. We are close to 100% to win if we
don’t play around and my read was wrong.
What do you guys want to do?”
Them: YOLO.
Oddly enough this seems to primarily be the
refrain of those in the process of committing suicide.
We would be no exception.
Final Thoughts:
They had the weapon surge. We lost.
We played a game for 8 turns (7 on our
side) and made at least 3 mistakes, 2 of which may have cost us the match.
We played a turn 2 pack rat and lost.
Because we made the perfect read against
one of the best teams in the world, we had a chance to win even when they were
drawing pretty well.
Its unfortunate that Magic chose that
moment in time to be a skill game.
FIN.
A great read (both the blog post, and on the weapon surge)! The way you formatted it and typed it out made it very easy to follow along step-by-step. Bravo.
ReplyDeleteAs pertains to the game itself, one thing I noticed that I'm guilty of, and am beginning to realize more frequently (in Magic and especially in LoL) is that while my decision making processes and analysis of game state/positioning may be thorough, my execution on that decision is done hastily and sloppily. I think this is what happened here, particularly with the choice of discarding the Rogue. I think that in the way we practice, it's important not only to analyze the decision trees but also to place a high degree of emphasis on the follow-through.
I've spent many hours agonizing over a PTQ finals loss several years ago, playing DDT, where I looked at many lines and found myself committing to one, however the order in which I cast my spells was super relevant - although I hadn't made it that far in my thought processes prior to casting the first spell in the line. And what should have been an invite to PT San Juan was instead a morose car ride back from Rochester.
i don't know all the cards, but i do know from poker second guessing yourself is a good thing 60% of the time. It's when you start 3rd guessing yourself u start to get into that negative territory. I attribute all my wins to just going for it and all my loses to just going for it, only recently have I taken the foot off the petal and realized that there is another way to play magic. The results arent' there for me yet, but I totally know that feel!
ReplyDelete